Should I buy individual US stocks like Apple, Nvidia and Microsoft instead of an index?
Published 19 September 2026
Building a portfolio with a handful of famous US stocks can leave you concentrated in a few companies and often in similar sectors.
The first international allocation should not be built around whichever companies or themes have produced the most visible recent returns.
For many investors, broad exposure such as the S&P 500 or a broader global portfolio should come before a concentrated Nasdaq, AI or semiconductor allocation.
Core first, satellite later.
“Avoid building your portfolio with those five famous US stocks.”
“Your first international allocation should not be a theme call. It should not even be a country call. It should be portfolio allocation — core first, satellite later.”
This is not personalized investment advice. Your goals, tax situation, portfolio size and risk tolerance may be different, so assess your own situation and discuss it with your financial and tax advisor.
Get your question answered by our advisor.
More from Sachin Kabra
GIFT City funds look easier because I don’t have to manage a foreign brokerage account. But they are often more expensive than ETFs. Is the extra cost justified?
Read More »US ETFs are often extremely cheap, while Ireland-domiciled UCITS ETFs can cost a little more. For an Indian investor, when does the structure matter more than the expense ratio?
Read More »I want to start investing in the US, but I’m confused between the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100. Are they interchangeable, or do they play very different roles?
Read More »If I believe India will continue to grow strongly over the next 10–20 years, is there still a reason to invest globally, or am I just diluting a good India portfolio?
Read More »Different SIF categories seem to have completely different risk and return profiles. How should I think about which category fits my portfolio?
Read More »