Are GIFT City global funds better than buying foreign ETFs directly?
Published 19 September 2026
A passive GIFT City fund can cost more than buying a US-listed or UCITS ETF directly.
But cost is not the only factor.
GIFT City funds can offer convenience and simpler operations.
You don’t need to select ETFs yourself, directly manage a foreign brokerage account or handle foreign-asset reporting in the same way.
You also get Indian AMC governance and an Indian service-support system.
So a GIFT City passive fund is not necessarily the cheapest route. It is more of a convenience and structural choice.
“So purely on cost, ETFs of course win.”
“The GIFT City passive route is not the cheapest route. It is more of a convenience and structural choice.”
This is not personalized investment advice. Your goals, tax situation, portfolio size and risk tolerance may be different, so assess your own situation and discuss it with your financial and tax advisor.
Get your question answered by our partner advisors.
Related guides
More from Sachin Kabra
US ETFs are often extremely cheap, while Ireland-domiciled UCITS ETFs can cost a little more. For an Indian investor, when does the structure matter more than the expense ratio?
Read More »I want to start investing in the US, but I’m confused between the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100. Are they interchangeable, or do they play very different roles?
Read More »If I believe India will continue to grow strongly over the next 10–20 years, is there still a reason to invest globally, or am I just diluting a good India portfolio?
Read More »Different SIF categories seem to have completely different risk and return profiles. How should I think about which category fits my portfolio?
Read More »There are now multiple SIF categories and strategies. Instead of looking at recent performance, what questions should I ask before selecting one?
Read More »