Doesn't spreading money across 12 asset classes just guarantee mediocre returns vs the Nifty?
Published 24 October 2026
they keep reading that they should diversify into gold, international equity, debt and so on.
But every year at least some of these underperform badly. Gold did nothing for long stretches and debt barely beats inflation.
Won't diversifying just drag their returns below the Nifty? They are young, so isn't maximum equity the obvious answer?
A free lunch is something that gives you a benefit without taking anything away, which is exactly what good diversification aims to achieve. The belief that diversification inherently steals return is one of the biggest fallacies investors carry.
When people say diversification gives lower returns than the market, they usually mean lower than the Nifty, which represents the Indian large-cap space. That comparison shows how strongly Indian large-cap equity dominates people's minds, making them forget they are managing personal wealth rather than running a fund with a fixed mandate.
Stretch your view to a decade, and you may find the market delivered around 12% a year while a well-diversified portfolio also delivered around 12%. The critical difference is that the market's volatility might have been about 16%, while the diversified portfolio's volatility was around 5%.
Picture building a cricket team where you don't just pick opening batsmen, but instead balance the squad with a wicketkeeper, pacers, and spinners. A portfolio works the same way, utilizing distinct asset classes that bring different skills precisely because they do not move together.
Some assets may get only a small weight depending on your comfort with drawdowns, and fine asset classes can go through long stretches without working. Gold is a perfect example, as it may look idle for years but then holds the portfolio together exactly when equity is falling.
Being young does give you more capacity for risk, but wealth management is fundamentally about risk management rather than pure risk-taking. You might consider keeping Indian equity as a large core while gradually adding pieces like international equity, gold, and debt.
The ultimate aim is that even during severe market events like 2008 or the recent pandemic, your overall drawdown never becomes heart-wrenching.
Based on Himanshu's podcast with Sachin: https://foliyo.ai/blog/investing-isnt-enough-managing-your-wealth/
Disclaimer: All information shared above are strictly for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial or investment advice.
Get your question answered by our partner advisors.
Related guides
More from Himanshu Pandya
Say a chartered accountant based in Ahmedabad has total investments about Rs 80L across mutual funds, some stocks, PPF and a bit of gold. In the 2020 COVID crash the overall…
Read More »A client is running a small manufacturing business in Ludhiana.. have about Rs 1Cr in regular-plan mutual funds through a distributor they have known for 10yr. The distributor is…
Read More »A clients is 42yrs, a senior manager in Gurugram. Total portfolio is about Rs 1.2Cr. Roughly 50% is in direct stocks. That includes about Rs 25L in shares they inherited from my…
Read More »A client, 36yrs old, working in IT, and have been investing through SIPs for about 8yr. Their portfolio is now around Rs 60L. Every year they added whichever flexi-cap or…
Read More »So far I have primarily invested in MFs and Gold. Gold has done well for me but MFs have given average returns. I am thinking to also buy some land in my hometown or invest in a…
Read More »