I need money in 3 years. Should any of that money be in equity?
Published 19 September 2026
Money required in three years should not depend on what equity does over the next three years.
A goal that is 20 years away can absorb much more volatility than something you need in the near term.
That is why debt can hold money required for nearer-term goals and reduce the chance that you are forced to sell equity during a weak market.
The basic principle is to match the asset to the deadline.
“Money required in three years should not depend on what equity does over the next three years.”
“Retirement money 20 years away can absorb far more volatility.”
This is not personalized investment advice. Your goals, time horizon, risk tolerance and financial situation may be different, so assess your own situation and discuss it with your financial advisor.
Get your question answered by our advisor.
More from Sachin Kabra
Most of my income, house and investments are already in India. Is there actually a reason to hold international equity even if Indian markets could outperform global markets?
Read More »If my target allocation changes because equity rallies or crashes, when should I actually rebalance? Should I do it every year or only when allocations move significantly?
Read More »Should I maintain a fixed equity-debt ratio and rebalance it myself, or use a dynamic strategy that increases and reduces equity depending on market valuations?
Read More »My investments are spread across several accounts and products, so I don’t really know my equity-debt allocation. Should I calculate allocation fund-by-fund or look at everything m…
Read More »