Is dynamic asset allocation better than keeping a fixed equity-debt allocation?

Published 19 September 2026

Vishal from Hyderabad
Should I maintain a fixed equity-debt ratio and rebalance it myself, or use a dynamic strategy that increases and reduces equity depending on market valuations?
Sachin Kabra Sachin Kabra ex-Director HDFC Private Wealth, Business Head Motilal Oswal AMC LinkedIn
There are two broad approaches discussed in the video.

A strategic or fixed allocation means choosing a target mix and rebalancing periodically. It is simple, transparent and under your control.

A dynamic allocation allows a fund manager or model to change the equity-debt mix as valuations and market conditions change.

The idea can be countercyclical: hold more equity when valuations become more attractive and reduce equity when valuations become stretched.

But dynamic allocation is not magic. Models can act early, markets can remain expensive for years, and reducing equity can mean missing part of a rally.

Neither approach wins every cycle. The better choice is the process you can understand and continue through uncomfortable periods.

“Dynamic allocation gives you convenience and behavioral support. Neither wins every cycle.”

“The better choice is the process you can understand and continue through that uncomfortable period.”

This is not personalized investment advice. Your goals, time horizon, risk tolerance and financial situation may be different, so assess your own situation and discuss it with your financial advisor.
More From Sachin Kabra →